WHAT WOULD MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DO? (JAN. 8, 2003)

"On some positions, cowardice asks the question, 'is it safe?' Expediency
asks the question, 'is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'is it popular?' But conscious asks the question 'is it right?' And the comes a time when a true follower of Jesus Christ must take a stand that's neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but he must take that stand because it is right."

- Martin Luther King Jr.

(above) Dr. Boyd E. Graves teaches a workshop on how the AIDS virus may have been designed to attract and bind to the OKT4 blood marker found primarily in the blood of the world’s Black populations. Lawyer Graves is suing the United States government for the full disclosure and deactivation of the formerly secret federal virus development program, the "U.S. Special Virus". (photo courtesy: John Price)

January 8, 2003

What Would Martin Luther King Jr. Say and Do?

Dr. King is dead, and there is nothing that he can say or do about the U.S. manufacture of AIDS. Very strange, none of us prioritize this federal program that is seeking to kill you and all who come from you. Instead we purposefully direct out attention elsewhere because the U.S. AIDS may not be at your doorstep today.

Our silence and inaction will be all the coffin nails they need.

I am gravely disappointed in the intelligence circles in the Black community. Here we have presented concrete science evidence of a secret, federal virus development program and nary a single one of you has picked it up and ran with it.

What a twisted world in which we live. Here we have Black people "paying no attention" to a federal program that will exterminate us all. Dr. King wouldn't have to say anything. It is clear we have sold our heart and souls to the devil. By not responding to the science proof, we allow for our biological enemies to continue to mix the stew that will forbear a world without Black people.

I think this issue would be center stage on Dr. King's platform. We know who he stood for. Here we have a U.S. federal program that is killing 200 of our brothers and sisters every hour and all we can do is wear "SHARPTON for PRESIDENT" buttons.

I will continue to fight in the Courts, Congress and the United Nations for full disclosure of this 'population control' microbe we call HIV. I am positive Dr. King would say, "We must stand up--Our Constitution does not give our government the right to kill us. By your silence and inaction you agree that we should be killed. If a Black man can not stand up to save his own life, he is certainly not going to stand up to save someone else's. Look at how trifling we have become. If we have our sports, music, movies and religion, you can't tell us shit! I am afraid the White man has centralized our intelligence so that we are unaffected by anything that is not knocking at the door."

The only thing is, HIV is stealth, it is designed that way. The CIA's microbioinnoculator is also stealth. It can give you AIDS at a distance of 100 yards, through your clothes, without your knowledge.

Dr. King would be pounding the House Negroes (the Congressional Black Caucus). How dare they represent us and remain silent about a secret, federal program that is killing 200 of us an hour.

Dr. King, a world without Black people is at hand.

Yet we clearly see that Black people are not concerned. They got theres’ and everybody else can scrap for themselves.

Our silence and inaction assists those who are striving for a world without Black people. C'mon hip hop, take the head phones off and work to ensure a future for yourself and all who may come from you. I am sure Dr. King would agree.

Boyd E. Graves, J.D.

Lead Plaintiff for AIDS Apology and Reconciliation, Case No 02 CV 02396, United States District Court for the Southern District of California

619-204-5683

POSITIVELY BLACK
What Would Martin Luther King Jr. Say and Do?
by Junious Ricardo Stanton

"On some positions, cowardice asks the question, 'is it safe?' Expediency
asks the question, 'is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'is it
popular?' But conscious asks the question 'is it right?' And the comes a
time when a true follower of Jesus Christ must take a stand that's neither
safe, nor politic, nor popular but he must take that stand because it is
right." - Martin Luther King Jr.

As we celebrate the birthday and legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. let us
pause and make the connection between what he stood for, what he dedicated
his life to and resolving if what he stood for and dedicated his life for is
worth celebrating, shouldn't we do likewise. If not then we might as well
stop saying we are honoring him, his life and legacy and shut up. The
monopoly media likes to bombard us with the sound byte of Martin Luther King
Jr. "I have a Dream' speech, the part where he talks about all men living
together, but they conveniently ignore the earlier part where he talks about
AmeriKKKa's promissory note, the note of justice, and equal treatment under
the law, that came back marked "insufficient funds". They never play his
speeches that oppose the Viet Nam War, why is that? If they don't and we
know that his opposition to violence and war are what made him stand out in
bold contrast to his contemporaries in the clergy, men like Billy Graham who
supported Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon's war in Southeast Asia, or
Norman Vincent Peale who never once spoke out against racial oppression, why
don't we acknowledge these virtues that made King a hero, especially at a
time when AmeriKKKa has morphed into the planet's biggest bully, picking on
the weak, bogarding the lunch money of the lame and infirm of the world.
What would Martin Luther King Jr. say to George W. Bush about publicly
calling for regime change in Iraq after stealing the election of 2000 in
AmeriKKKa? What would King say to the cowardly and immoral U.S. Congress
about their limp and non-existent opposition to the concept of pre-emptive
strikes and use of nuclear weapons? At the time of his assassination King
was rumbling on several fronts, supporting the sanitation workers in Memphis
and planning the Poor People's Campaign in Washington D.C. to call attention
to the quantum gap between the have's and have nots and how the War in Viet
Nam was contributing to this gap.
At least in 1968 there was a sizable anti-war movement in the U.S. and
King's joining that movement caused the ruling elites great chagrin. His
Poor People's Campaign with its emphasis on wealth disparities and policies
that perpetuated those inequities while the Military -Industrial Complex was
growing richer every day and the attention he focused on AmeriKKKa's immoral
war in Southeast Asia is what prompted the powers that be to order his
assassination. But let us project what we know about King and imagine he was
still alive with us now, what would he say and do? I believe he would oppose
Bush administration's fascist agenda. I believe he would be calling for
rallies, marches, boycotts and massive civil disobedience to call attention
to AmeriKKKa's wickedness and galvanize the grass roots to action. I believe
Martin Luther King Jr would denounce the masses' induced passivity and
acquiescence in the face of fascism and warmongering. King liked to quote
the Biblical prophet Isaiah who spoke of truth , justice and righteousness.
King was not an Afrocentric theologian but I believe if he lived he would
have looked at and rethought African history, how the ancient Hebrews were
influenced by Kemet and Ethiopia and be forced to acknowledge the
righteousness Isaiah talked about was inherent in the culture of Africa.
King might have realized that Maat ( Divine Order, Balance, Harmony, Truth,
Justice, Righteousness and Reciprocity) was the moral/ethical model for
Hebrew prophecy and called upon this ancient African moral and ethical
building block to rally against the forces of Isfet (Disorder, deceit,
chaos, disharmony and war).

As we prepare to celebrate the life and sacrifices of this man, we must do
some serious introspection and ask ourselves not only what would Martin say
or do, where would he stand on the great issues of today, but more
importantly where do I/we stand? Are we trying to be safe popular, expedient
or are we committed to doing the right thing? We must look at the world and determine how

we can alter AmeriKKKa's descent into the moral abyss of fascist imperialism?

------------------------