{Bold, underlines, and book links have been added independently webmaster@boydgraves.com }
To: Dr. Boyd E. Graves
Re: HIV & VISNA
From: Professor
Robert E. Lee, M.S., M.S.W., L.C.S.W.
Author of
AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time Bomb?
Author of
AIDS: Our Chances, Our Choices
Dear Boyd:
Relative to the evolution of HIV and
Maedi-Visna Virus, I can say this:
1. Visna has been called "visna" since about
1932 when it appeared in sheep in Iceland. Prior to that, it was seen as
a progressive pneumonia in sheep in Montana.
2. There have been many outbreaks of visna in
sheep herds in the past 50 years requiring the killing of entire flocks to
prevent transmission.
3. There have not been any previous outbreaks
of HIV in any recorded history prior to this present outbreak. There is
no mythology or other tribal stories of a wasting disease in Africa prior
to the present HIV outbreak of which I am aware. Granted, I am not an
anthropologist and have not visited central Africa but a thorough check by
me of any central African mythology/tribal verbal histories shows no
reference to a wasting disease.
4. HIV is alleged to mutate at a rate 1000
times faster than the typical influenza virus. This is astounding
evolution given that there is need for new update influenza vaccinations
every year to prevent infection. I know that visna also mutates but I do
not believe it is at the same rate as HIV.
5. I therefore conclude that while HIV and
visna are related agents, I do not believe that they evolved together.
There is no evidence to suggest this anywhere of which I am aware.
6. There is substantial evidence to suggest
that visna was grown in human cells prior to any recorded outbreak of HIV
anywhere on the planet. I have previously cited at least 4 different
scientific articles prior to 1980 showing that visna had been grown in
human cells, e.g., astrocytes, etc., with the earliest records going back
into the 1960s.
7. There is a demonstrated paradigm in the
molecular/virological sciences of taking a virus occurring in one species
and moving it into non-permissive species. Particularly there is a
demonstrated paradigm showing movement of these retroviral/lentiviral
agents into primates, e.g., the Feline Sarcoma Virus used to infect
marmoset monkeys. There are other indications that feline and mouse
retroviruses have been used to infect primate hosts in the literature.
There is direct statement in the scientific literature of the movement of
maedi-visna virus into porcine, bovine, primate, and human cells... all
of this occurring prior to any advent of HIV anywhere on the planet.
8. Rather than to accept the "visna and HIV
have evolved together" data which infers a natural origin to HIV based on
phylogenic comparison, assumptions concerning molecular clocks, and other
molecular-biological mumbo-jumbo, I believe it is rather more useful to
examine the literature which shows this:
VISNA VIRUS WAS MOVED INTO PORCINE,
BOVINE, AND HUMAN CELLS CAUSING PRODUCTIVE INFECTION PRIOR TO ANY ADVENT
OF HIV ANYWHERE.
9. The capital-lettered statement above is
uncontestable. It is a fact.
10. I can also say that there are other
leukemia and lymphomas and sarcomas which have been moved into human and
primate cells as well resulting in productive infection of the primate and
human cells.
11. I can also tell you that every molecular
biologist in the land will ignore what I have just said and will tell you
eleventy-jillion stories about where HIV origin came from monkeys in
remote Africa and tribesmen eating monkeys. I can tell you this: I don't
believe that explanation for one second. Rather, I believe, based on now
some 16 years of investigation of this whole thing that HIV is a strategic
biological weapon designed to kill billions of people in a slow-unfolding
relentless holocaust which was released in two different vaccination
programs: a) the smallpox vaccination program in Africa commencing in the
late 1960s, b) the hepatitis-B vaccination program in the United States in
the mid-to-late 1970s. Moreover, so it is perfectly clear, this
contamination was no accident. It was done on purpose with the goal of
"thinning the herd" in a nazi-like mindset that has covertly governed
population control politics since the 1870s. These same politics had
pervaded the WHO and most of western medical experimental science
throughout the 20th century. And, to be very pointed: the same political
ideology is still there. Non-whites are detrimental to the gene pool's
evolution so says the political philosophy. To see a bit of this in
history, go here:
This belief system is pervasive in the
molecular sciences as it is at the heart of eugenics, cloning, evolution,
and heritability.
After looking at the above information answer
this question: Why are non-whites all susceptible to HIV infection
whereas there are 1% of whites who are impervious to HIV infection as they
have the homozygous CCR5-32 deletion allele. Why would a disease evolving
in sheep have a relationship to an emergent disease in humans that will
infect every non-white person and not infect some white people and that
relationship just happens to be by accident given there is a history of
scientific racism going back to 1870?
Am I saying that Visna is HIV? NO. I am
saying they are related lentiviruses.
Am I saying that there is an alternative
explanation deserving fair hearing of the origin of HIV? YES.
Am I saying there is a rat in the proverbial
woodpile? YES.
This is not a "by accident" thing here that there is a relationship between HIV and Visna.
Will what I think make any difference at all?
NO.
Will any politician address this? NO.
Will any biologist come forward and tell the
truth? NO.
Will any court hear the evidence and rule a
finding that HIV is a strategic biological weapon? NO.
Will any peer-reviewed scientific journal
seriously address the deep-dark racist biological weapons programs and
their attack on people of color? NO.
Professor Robert E. Lee
M.S., M.S.W., L.C.S.W.
Author of AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time Bomb?
Author of AIDS: Our Chances, Our Choices
Author of AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time Bomb?
Author of AIDS: Our Chances, Our Choices
Related Story:
Leading AIDS Origin Author Endorses International AIDS Review
