Notes: Hyperlinks have been added for convenience by the web master. Highlighed text may not appear in original documents. |
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRIDCT OF CALIFORNIA
BOYD ED GRAVES, CASE NO. 02 CV 02396 PLAINTIFF, v. Motion for extension THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET. AL. Judge Jeffrey Miller DEFENDANT
CONCURRANCE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME/DOCKET REVIEW
Now comes plaintiff, Boyd Ed Graves, pursuant to a conference call between the parties on Monday, August 4, 2003, who seeks an additional extension of time (60 days) as agreed by the parties. Plaintiff has encountered a second incidence of police misconduct relative to this Court proceeding. See, EXHIBIT "E", herein. Plaintiff was institutionalized for making "irrational statements that the government made HIV/AIDS. Id. Since appearing before this federal Court on July 3, 2003, under color of law, plaintiff has been "fetched-up" twice, beaten, injected, interrogated, dumped into a violently mentally ill facility, stripped naked for ten hours, denied medical attention and dumped for five days in the general inmate population. Plaintiff requests this extension of time in which to address the false criminal charges against him. Plaintiff is also recovering from surgery to his dominant hand. A review of the docket of this case for evidence in which to overturn the judgment of July 7, 2003, reveals the Court has held out the venue of "wide latitude" and " reasonable accommodation" solely for namesake purposes. Consistent with the presentation of the defendant, the Court has adopted an interpretation of FOIA law that is grossly inconsistent and in grave error with the long-standing ideals of the original intent of the law. In essence, plaintiff prays the court will move on its own initiative and nullify the judgment Order of July 7, 2003 and schedule an immediate hearing on the evidence of a secret AIDS development program, the U.S. Special Virus program. Plaintiff believes the 1971 HIV flowchart located by defendant on May 15, 2000, is absolutely (some) evidence of a virus program. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, summary judgment to the United States in this case is inappropriate and reversible error. See, Celotex Corp. V. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986). Plaintiff has raised a genuine issue to be tried (All the evidence should be disclosed) and both parties concede the veracity of the 'initial evidence' (the programs 1971 flowchart). The judgment Order for summary judgment should be overturned sua sponte. The Court designated this plaintiff, in propria persona, after conducting several cursory reviews of the complaint filed on December 6, 2002. The Court had ample time to alert the plaintiff to any technical defects so the adjudication would be advancing. WHEREFORE; plaintiff prays the court will overturn its judgment Order of July 7, 2003, sua sppmte, and immediately demand a new hearing on the supportive evidence of the U.S. Special Virus program, leading to full disclosure of a "parallel government" program, contrary to every democratic constitutional principle of the United States and the world. Plaintiff prays the Court will award attorney fees in the amount of twenty five million dollars ($25,000,000.00). There is strong evidence this plaintiff will be successful regarding this FOIA lawsuit. Defendant (Alan S. Rabson, M.D.) has been proven to be a key perpetrator of the AIDS fraud, as he is listed in the secret program as a "DEVELOPER". As Deputy Director of the National Cancer Institute, the United States has purposefully maintained Dr. Rabson in a 'key position' for a long time, solely to effect the cover of the U.S. Special (AIDS) Virus program and the true intent of the United States to kill its own citizens and others. History will clearly show nazi Germany was only "dabbling blood-tasting foreplay", before the lust. Respectfully submitted,
Boyd Ed Graves 4486 38th Street, Unit #1 San Diego, Ca 92116 619-281-8401 Dated: ______________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, BOYD ED GRAVES, do hereby certify with my signature below that I served a complete copy of this motion for extension of time on: John C. Ashcroft Carol A. Law Beth L. Levine 880 Front St, Rm 6293 San Diego, Ca 92101 Sent via hand delivery this ____day of August, 2003.
Boyd E. Graves
|